Skip to main content
Back to selected work
// NETWORK · OPTIMIZATION

The Lang School. Two floors, seventeen radios.

On-site UniFi WiFi troubleshooting at 26 Broadway. The reported symptom was instability and poor wireless performance across the school. Findings: an over-dense AP footprint with five radios disconnecting on a loop. Stabilized in a single visit; written exit report on the way out.

Client
The Lang School
Sector
Education / K-12
Location
26 Broadway, Suite 900, New York, NY 10004
Engagement
UniFi WiFi diagnostic + optimization
Performed by
ShiftCTRL
§ 01 · Objective

Stabilize first. Optimize after.

The objective of this visit was to assess, stabilize, and optimize the existing UniFi wireless environment based on reported WiFi instability and poor wireless performance across both floors of the school.

§ 02 · Work performed

One visit. The full pass.

  • Reviewed the UniFi network topology, wireless settings, logs, and the physical and virtual environment end-to-end.
  • Performed multiple on-site walkthroughs across both floors, assessing signal behavior, roaming, latency, throughput, and real-world client performance.
  • Reviewed the rack, cabling, and installed network hardware.
  • Created a backup of the UniFi OS / control-plane configuration and uploaded it to the client's designated Google Drive.
  • Isolated the five faulty access points driving the wireless instability. One was disabled cleanly through the UniFi controller; the other four were oscillating faster than controller policy could converge, so a software disable would not have been deterministic — they were decommissioned at the switch-port level instead, which guarantees the radio is off and keeps the management plane authoritative. All five were tagged for RMA evaluation.
  • Performed limited wireless optimization — reducing transmit power on select APs to relieve overlap and contention.
  • Re-tested the environment via log review and an additional walkthrough. Confirmed improved wireless stability and better client behavior following the changes.
§ 03 · Key findings

Density first, organization second.

// FINDING 01

Over-dense AP footprintPRIMARY

A total of 17 access points were visible in the UniFi controller. The active AP footprint appeared excessive for the size and layout of the space, creating overlap, contention, and unnecessary RF complexity.

// FINDING 02

Five APs in a disconnect / reconnect loopPRIMARY

Five access points were oscillating in a hardware-failure disconnect / reconnect cycle. The flap rate exceeded the window required for controller-driven configuration to apply cleanly, so four were decommissioned at the switch port — a deterministic isolation where a software disable would not have been — and tagged for RMA.

// FINDING 03

Mixed-vendor switching limits visibilitySTRUCTURAL

The network includes EdgeSwitch hardware alongside a UniFi switch and a UniFi gateway. The mix limits unified visibility and management through the UniFi control plane.

// FINDING 04

Disorganized rack and cabling

The rack and cabling environment was disorganized, with cables needing repatching and labeling. Additional labeling of cables and network-connected devices would make future troubleshooting and support significantly easier.

§ 04 · Recommendations

What we'd do next.

REC A · WIRELESS OPTIMIZATION

A second optimization pass.

  • Additional AP right-sizing
  • Further radio / channel / transmit-power tuning
  • Review of AP placement strategy
  • Validation under normal occupancy conditions
REC B · STANDARDIZATION

Hardware standardization.

Bring more of the switching environment into the UniFi ecosystem where appropriate. Improves visibility, troubleshooting, centralized management, and control-plane consistency.

REC C · RACK CLEANUP

Repatch and label.

Clean up the rack, repatch with intent, and label both cables and devices. Improves serviceability, troubleshooting speed, documentation clarity, and long-term reliability.

REC D · RESILIENCY

Failover and recovery planning.

If higher uptime is important for school operations, evaluate a more resilient design: internet failover, gateway redundancy, more resilient switch design, and better-defined recovery / backup procedures.

§ 05 · Closing summary

Stabilized in one visit. Documented on the way out.

The wireless plane was stabilized in a single visit. Faulty radios were isolated where they would have continued to destabilize the controller's view of the network, and transmit power was re-tuned on the surviving APs to relieve the co-channel interference left behind by the over-dense footprint.

The engagement closed out with a written exit report covering the diagnosis, the actions taken, and the resulting state of the wireless plane.

// DISCLAIMER · INDEPENDENT-AGENCY TERMS

This case study is presented for informational purposes only and illustrates the professional services performed by ShiftCTRL in collaboration with the named client. By accessing or referencing this case study, you acknowledge and agree to the following terms.

  1. Independent agency status.ShiftCTRL operates as an independent engineering firm providing professional services including consulting, software development, system design, implementation, and optimization.
  2. Ownership of intellectual property.All intellectual property — including patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, and other proprietary rights associated with the systems described — is the sole property of the respective client. ShiftCTRL does not claim ownership over any intellectual property developed during its engagements.
  3. Client responsibility.The client retains full ownership, responsibility, and control over their technology, systems, and data. ShiftCTRL's role is strictly limited to providing professional services as outlined in the contractual agreement.
  4. No endorsement or affiliation.This case study does not imply formal endorsement, partnership, or affiliation between ShiftCTRL and the client unless explicitly stated in writing by both parties.
  5. Confidentiality and non-disclosure.ShiftCTRL upholds the privacy and confidentiality agreements in place with its clients. All information presented adheres to those obligations; sensitive details are omitted or anonymized where required.
  6. Limitation of liability.ShiftCTRL is not liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or special damages arising from the use or interpretation of this case study. Outcomes are specific to the client's circumstances and are not warranties of similar results for other engagements.
  7. Scope of responsibility.ShiftCTRL's responsibilities for the operation, maintenance, performance, security, or compliance of the systems described are defined by the contractual agreement established with the client and do not extend beyond its terms.
// GET IN TOUCH

WiFi unstable across your floor?

The Lang School pattern — too many APs, several in a reconnect loop, mixed-vendor switching — is one we see often. We come on-site, walk it, stabilize it, and leave you with a written exit report.